Recall that I started this series explaining that I’m drawing from photos in the archives of the Canal Society of New York.
It’s fitting that this post in the series gets designated as M; M for Matton. Here’s a quote from the shipyard history site: “John E. Matton started his original shipyard in 1899, on the Champlain Canal, about three miles north of the Waterford side-cut: he moved to Cohoes in 1916. [I know the second site, but the 1899 site on the old Champlain Canal I’m not familiar enough with Waterford to know its location.] His son Ralph joined him in 1922 and the company became, first, John E. Matton & Son, and, later, John E. Matton & Sons. The yard closed in 1966 and was sold to Bart Turecamo, who kept the Matton name, operating it as Matton Shipyard Company, until it closed again in 1983.”
Two more installments of this post are coming, but a frustration of an exercise like this is that no fewer than five boats carried the name John E. Matton between 1911 and 1964. Initially I imagined the photo below to show the 1911 John E. Matton, but that was a canal boat–not a tug–and the signboard in the photo below shows the company name, post 1922.
Having cleared that up, this is an intriguing photo. In this closer up view, you see no fewer than 15 men on board, some of them with white boards or drafting tables and instruments on tripods, either theodolites [likely] or cameras. A good number of the men–but not all of them– are looking in the direction of the photographer, which makes this a somewhat casual shot.
Also, notice the name board on the bow begins with a P, then a C and ends with an N.
The name board on the wheelhouse also begins with a P. However, looking at the shipyard history site, I find no Matton-built boat that begins with a P. So what tugboat is this, and what would all these men be doing? Did Matton own a tugboat which they did not build?
If that is complicated, it gets more so. The 1939 John E. Matton was sold to the USN in 1940 and renamed Tamaque, YN 52, and the next one was not built until 1945. If this is not the 1939 build, what is it?
Identity of the tug aside, it’s interesting to see the barge max out the space available in lock E-2.
The photo below is clear, so is this the 1939 John E. Matton, which became Tamaque, Athena, Jesse D, and Atlantic 7?
With a clearer photo and better angle, I might be able to determine if the photo above and below show the same vessel. Lightening of the photo thanks to Bob Mattsson.
This archive is no help for photos of the 1945 John E. Matton (then Hollywood and Brevard).
The 1958 John E. Matton has been covered here as Cissy Reinauer, Cissi, Mischief, and finally Thornton Bros, which was scrapped in 2014.
The 1964 John E. Matton also does not appear; it became Helen J. Turecamo at some point after 1966 and sank in 1988, although I don’t know any of the details or location of that loss.
More Matton boats–less frustrating ones– are up in next post.
Many thanks to the Canal Society of New York for allowing me access to these photos.
15 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 23, 2022 at 12:26 pm
Daniel J Meeter
What does it say about the Erie / NY State Barge Canal, in distinction from all the other canals in the US, that so many boats (tugs) were built for it. Is there any other canal in the continental US that had so many boats under power? I know that it is something of a function of the “water-level-route” nature of the canal, compared to say the canals across Pennsylvania and West Virginia, or even the Ohio Canal, so it’s largely to be understood, but still, are there any other US canals that had so many tugs and other boats under power? (I am excluding of course the river systems like the Ohio-Mississippi.)
February 24, 2022 at 5:27 am
tugster
Daniel– What it says about the Erie/Barge Canal is that it really was an economic engine and thoroughfare for the Upper MidWest and NYC during these years before the Interstate system and the Saint Lawrence Seaway. This was the heyday of manufacturing in the NorthEast; since then, transportation infrastructure and manufacturing have risen in other parts of the US before being moved offshore.
February 24, 2022 at 1:00 pm
Daniel J Meeter
Will, fair enough. But were there any other US canals (besides maybe Champlain) that had working tugs and other boats under power?
February 24, 2022 at 1:52 pm
tugster
Daniel– A smaller system is the Columbia/Snake has some tug traffic, thanks to 8 locks/dams.
February 23, 2022 at 12:40 pm
Bob Mattsson
I would say the tripod holds a movie camera and the white boards are are used to reflect natural light. They still use them today.
February 23, 2022 at 1:27 pm
Lee Rust
Ditto the moviemaking observation… the large white disks under the platform also look like reflectors, and the excess of well-dressed but casual characters befits the ‘Hollywood’ style of the times.
Poking around in the details of old photos like this is lots of fun.
February 23, 2022 at 2:48 pm
William Lafferty
Your unidentified Matton tug is the P. C. Ronan, built 1895 at Albany for the Ronan Towing Line of New York. Matton obtained it from the American Dredging Company in 1923 and Matton had it until 1943 when it was sold to the Huffman Construction Company of Buffalo. It was abandoned in 1950.
Calling upon my experience in a previous profession, we see what appears to be a Mitchell 35-mm NC model film motion picture on a tripod between the two men by the pilothouse, so …
February 23, 2022 at 2:56 pm
Lee Rust
Judging from the camera platform setup and array of equipment on the barge, I would guess that the subject of the movie shot could well have been the vessel from which the photo was taken.
February 23, 2022 at 6:09 pm
William Lafferty
The tug pushing the barge into the lock is the Ralph E. Matton. If the date of the photograph is correct, this is the Ralph built 1922 at Sharptown, Maryland, by Eastern Shore Shipbuilding Company for the navy as Harbor Tug No. 57, later Penn Manor owned by the Hainesport Mining & Transportation Company of Philadelphia. It lasted until 1957 when a new, steel Ralph E. Matton materialized from Cohoes.
The “clear” photograph shows the 1958 John E. Matton, with collapsible davits and a pilothouse identical to the Thonton Bros. Of course, that huge radar set would preclude it from being the John E. Matton of 1939-1940! The last two photographs are the same John E. Matton.
February 24, 2022 at 5:21 am
tugster
Bob, Lee, and William– Thx much for your really astute observations. I have seen more theodolites than movie cameras in my day and therefore could not imagine what that large and jocular crew would be filming on the Barge Canal. Maybe it was a newsreel about this commercial engine, the Barge Canal itself. I’m reminded of filming of NYS Canals aspects in the past 10 years for several TV shows; of course, video cameras these days are more portable and sophisticated. It turns out that I have a photo from the archives of P. C. Ronan, which I’ll post tomorrow. I love the feeling here that we are group solving a puzzle and putting together a narrative I’d never imagined. I am really grateful to you all for pitching in. Lee . . . I agree: this is fun!
February 24, 2022 at 2:40 pm
John Callaghan
They are filming this movie in Whitehall, NY, I believe:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0019930/
February 24, 2022 at 2:45 pm
tugster
Here are a few more links on that? Is a copy available somewhere . . . that’s what I want to know . . . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl_on_the_Barge and this: https://www.adirondackalmanack.com/2011/01/whitehall-movie-the-girl-on-the-barge.html
February 24, 2022 at 6:58 pm
tugster
Here are some stills from the 1929 movie: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0019930/mediaviewer/rm1482143489/
June 11, 2022 at 1:01 pm
George Schneider
I guess I’m bringing up the tail-end, trying to catch up while I’m home for a brief time.
HELEN J TURECAMO was damaged in a collision and sank at Charleston SC 17 June 1988. She was raised, and I believe she is the North Carolina artificial reef vessel named HELENA
June 11, 2022 at 4:41 pm
tugster
Thx, George… This led me to an NC DEQ interactive map. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/marine-fisheries/public-information-and-education/coastal-fishing-information/artificial-reefs/sunken-vessel-history#ar-465
AR-345 is an interesting one. It did not, however, list Helena. I hope you enjoy yr upcoming travels.